Additional Resource Material for this Sunday
Ideal for catechetical and liturgical dramatization of today's gospel.
|
6th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Cycle C)
|
|
God Is On Our
Side
The Beatitudes – one of the best known parts and adopted from the Gospel – best summarize the fundamental preachings and activities of Jesus: the proclamation of the Good News to the poor. The Beatitudes are not a collection of conduct norms (such as “we must” be poor, “we must” be merciful…). They are joyful news intended for the poor, the losers and the oppressed. In order to highlight this aspect of the Good News – which is very concrete – and not to reduce the Beatitudes into mere moralizing and abstraction, Jesus in this episode discourses on the Beatitudes in the concrete situation of hopelessness and pain, and that was when the peasants of Capernaum lost all their harvest. The so-called “Mount of Beatitudes” or “the Mount of the Seven Fountains” is situated about three kilometers from Capernaum. Although it is of low altitude – about 100 meters – one can see the whole of Lake Galilee from its peak in an exceptionally breathtaking view. The Church of the Beatitudes was constructed there in 1937. It has eight walls in memory of the Eight Beatitudes as cited in the Gospel of Matthew. On various occasions they were adopted as a formula for consolation. Those who weep and suffer from hunger should not despair. God will wipe their tears, feed them and fill their hearts with joy.... up to the world beyond. If everything has been bleak for them on earth then their fate will change in the afterlife. Such adulteration of the Gospel departs from the false interpretation that the Kingdom of God which Jesus proclaims to the poor is equivalent to the Kingdom of “the heavens,” as a kind of promise for the other life. The Gospel, however, is an historical message. If Jesus calls the poor blessed and tells them to rejoice, it is because they will cease to be poor when the Kingdom of Justice comes on earth. The Beatitudes are already an indication of God’s intervention. Hope is proclaimed that a change in history in favor of the oppressed is now under way. The Gospel is not a kind of resignation or consolation for the less privileged but a catalyst for commitment, a call to “hold high one’s head with the coming of the day of liberation.” (Lk 21:28). Instead of saying: “Happy are you, the poor,” Jesus says: “Happy are we, the poor.” “We who weep, we who hunger...”. Jesus was poor, as poor and oppressed as the people of Capernaum to whom he addressed the Beatitudes. This is too easily forgotten, making Jesus some kind of a religious guru who “makes himself poor,” disguises himself, so that the poor will understand him better. This is his apostolate and gesture of divine condescension with the suffering people. Having this in mind, we distort not only a portion but the very essence of the Gospel. We misrepresent God’s plan who wished to reveal Himself concretely in the person of a humble peasant of Nazareth. In fact, up to this day, He continues to manifest Himself in the life and struggle of the poor. There have been speculations on who these poor people were to whom Jesus addressed the Beatitudes. So much has been said about the “poor in spirit.” In Luke it says: happy are the poor, while in Matthew, it is: the poor in spirit. (In other translations, we have: Those who know how to be poor, those who opt to be poor). Surely, Luke’s tradition is the most original. Jesus addresses himself to those who actually have nothing, those who suffer hunger. This “spirit” which Matthew added later on is in line with the preachings of the prophets of the Old Testament, who often discoursed on the “humble in spirit,” the “downcast in spirit,” the “anawim” (the poor). The word “anawim,” a key word in biblical texts, corresponds with the unfortunate, the oppressed, the helpless, the hopeless men and women who rely on God’s mercy because they are rejected by the rich and powerful. Luke stresses the fact of the poor’s external oppression. Matthew, on the other hand, focuses on their spiritual need (which is always present in people suffering from external oppression). Matthew and Luke wrote for different readers. The Church addressed by Luke was generally composed of oppressed men and women within the powerful structure of the Roman empire: slaves and urban people of various social orientation exploited by the harsh conditions of life... Matthew catered to the Jewish Church which was still easy prey to influential thinking of the pharisees, like: Decent people are good and obey moral laws, etc. His “poor in spirit” are those who lack morality, the sinners, people of ill-repute... Notwithstanding this difference in nuances, Luke and Matthew successfully get across the prophetic message of Jesus: The Kingdom of God is His gift to the poor of this world. Although Matthew presents us eight Beatitudes and Luke only four (including his lamentations against the rich), the texts should not be misunderstood as an index handed to us by two different types of people. Both evangelists speak of one and the same reality: “Happy are the poor” and this sums up all the Beatitudes. Everything boils down to this prescription: Happy are the poor because God is on their side and they cease to be poor. They are not happy because of “their good comportment,” but because “they are poor.” The situation they are in, oppression and exploitation, has earned for themselves God’s sympathy. God prefers the poor not because they are “good” but because they are poor. This message of Jesus is absolutely revolutionary. Aside from saying that moral norms as criteria for God’s benevolence do not count, the message further states that God puts Himself in the context of historical conflicts: the side of people on the bottom of the ladder. The meaning of “poverty” can be erroneous. In the Bible, poverty as a state of oppression is a scandalous condition because it is anti-life. Therefore it is against the will of God. Poverty must be rejected, fought against and eliminated. It is not fate but the consequence of human abuse of others. Christian attitude towards poverty must be that of God: reject it and show a preference for the poor. It is an option which does not end in mere denunciation and words of condemnation. The old Mosaic Laws were not mere words; they were social laws intended to avoid poverty and defend the poor. Every effort to fight and suppress poverty is therefore a step toward promoting the Kingdom of God even if those who are involved in it do not believe in God nor in Jesus. Therefore, poverty should not be introduced as a Christian ideal. To opt for poverty – in present-day situations of injustice being experienced by various countries – becomes a Christian preference only when it is in solidarity with the poor in their struggle against poverty. Taken in another light, poverty shall be understood as “infancy” before the Lord: such as the attitude of humility, with no power, with no aspirations. This “poverty-infancy” tandem is in line with this biblical interpretation. However, it is obvious that a person who accumulates wealth and privilege at the expense of others shall never be poor in this sense if he or she does not first rid self of wealth and power. (Mt 5:1-12; Lk 6:20-26) Taken
from the book: A Certain Jesus, Vol. 1 (Chapter
28) This book offers a new approach to appreciating the life of Jesus. The first part of the Chapter is in dialogue form in an up-to-date conversational language. This makes the reader realize that Jesus was once a very ordinary guy, a typical man in his time. The last part of each chapter contains an explanation of the biblical references, thus giving one the perspective for reflection. |
|
Back to Daily
Liturgy
|